基于边界面的多隔舱筒形基础动力分析

吴诗阳, 曹永勇

吴诗阳,曹永勇. 基于边界面的多隔舱筒形基础动力分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2020(3):114-121. DOI: 10.12170/20190523001
引用本文: 吴诗阳,曹永勇. 基于边界面的多隔舱筒形基础动力分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报,2020(3):114-121. DOI: 10.12170/20190523001
(WU Shiyang, CAO Yongyong. Dynamic analysis of multi-compartment bucket foundation based on boundary model[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2020(3): 114-121. (in Chinese)). DOI: 10.12170/20190523001
Citation: (WU Shiyang, CAO Yongyong. Dynamic analysis of multi-compartment bucket foundation based on boundary model[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2020(3): 114-121. (in Chinese)). DOI: 10.12170/20190523001

基于边界面的多隔舱筒形基础动力分析

基金项目: 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BE20171129);南京水利科学研究院重点基金项目(Y317010)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    吴诗阳(1990—),男,安徽青阳人,博士,主要从事海上结构与土相互作用研究。E-mail:718228381@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: TU443

Dynamic analysis of multi-compartment bucket foundation based on boundary model

  • 摘要: 多隔舱筒形基础作为近几年发展起来的海上风电基础结构,其稳定性能极大影响了风机的安全性。为研究在极端风荷载作用下筒形基础的稳定性,通过AR自回归线性滤波法,模拟脉动风速谱,采用边界面弹塑性动力本构模型,运用大型有限元分析软件ABAQUS进行了三维动力数值分析,研究了该结构在随机风荷载作用下的沉降发展、动力响应和周围土体的孔压变化情况。研究表明:随着加载持续,筒体的水平位移、转角和竖向位移均呈缓慢增长趋势,同时筒体顶部水平位移远大于端部位移;基础内部土体孔压受分舱板影响,发展缓慢且小于基础外侧土体孔压,沿筒径方向,越靠近筒壁孔压越大;基础外侧,土体孔压随埋深的增加逐渐减小,最后趋于稳定;土体的应力路径逐渐向临界状态线靠近,但并未达到破坏标准。
    Abstract: As the infrastructure of offshore wind power developed in recent years, the stability of the multi-compartment cylindrical foundation impacts on the fan’s safety greatly. In order to study the stability of cylindrical foundation under extreme wind load, the AR autoregression linear filtering method was applied to simulate the fluctuating wind speed spectrum in the study, and the boundary surface elastoplastic dynamic constitutive model and the large-scale finite element analysis software ABAQUS were used to analyze the 3D dynamic value, and study the settlement development of the structure under the random wind load, dynamic response and the pore pressure change of surrounding soil. The study indicated: as the loading continued, the cylindrical horizontal displacement, rotation angle and vertical displacement all trended to increase slowly, meanwhile, the cylindrical top horizontal displacement was much larger than that in the end; affected by the subdivision plate, the pore pressure of the soil in the foundation developed slowly and was smaller than that outside the foundation; along the cylindrical diameter, the closer to the cylinder wall, the greater the pore pressure was; on the out side of the foundation, the pore pressure of the soil decreased gradually with the buried depth, and finally tended to be stable; the stress path of soil was gradually close to the critical state line, but did not reach the failure standard.
  • 图  1   筒形基础结构(单位:m)

    Figure  1.   Structure of bucket foundation (unit: m)

    图  2   模拟脉动风速功率谱分析

    Figure  2.   Spectrum analysis of turbulent wind simulation

    图  3   风荷载的时程曲线

    Figure  3.   Time history curve of wind load

    图  4   有限元计算模型

    Figure  4.   Numerical model of finite element

    图  5   筒体中心点水平位移和转角的时程曲线

    Figure  5.   Time history curve of horizontal displacement and corner of the bucket center

    图  6   筒体右侧点竖向位移的时程曲线

    Figure  6.   Time history curve of right point about bucket foundation

    图  7   不同时间节点的筒体水平位移

    Figure  7.   Horizontal displacement of different time nodes

    图  8   筒内部两点孔隙水压力时程曲线

    Figure  8.   Time history curve of pore pressure about two points in a cylinder

    图  9   筒外部两点孔隙水压力时程曲线

    Figure  9.   Time history curve of pore pressure about two points outside a cylinder

    图  10   超孔压沿不同路径方向变化值

    Figure  10.   The excess pore pressure changes in the direction of the path

    图  11   应力路径变化

    Figure  11.   Stress path change

    图  12   弹塑性应变时程曲线

    Figure  12.   Time history of elastic-plastic strain

  • [1]

    LIU M M, YANG M, WANG H J. Bearing behavior of wide-shallow bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in drained silty sand[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 82: 169-179. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.02.034

    [2]

    BRANSBY M F, RANDOLPH M F. Combined loading of skirted foundations[J]. Géotechnique, 1998, 48(5): 637-655. doi: 10.1680/geot.1998.48.5.637

    [3]

    GOURVENEC S. Effect of embedment on the undrained capacity of shallow foundations under general loading[J]. Géotechnique, 2008, 58(3): 177-185. doi: 10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.177

    [4]

    GOURVENEC S, BARNETT S. Undrained failure envelope for skirted foundations under general loading[J]. Géotechnique, 2011, 61(3): 263-270. doi: 10.1680/geot.9.T.027

    [5]

    BARARI A, IBSEN L B. Vertical capacity of bucket foundations in undrained soil[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2014, 20(3): 360-371. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2013.801915

    [6]

    SUN L Q, HUO Z L, YAN S W. Numerical studies on the working mechanism and bearing capacity of bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2015, 73(Suppl1): 478-482.

    [7]

    ZHANG J H, ZHANG L M, LU X B. Centrifuge modeling of suction bucket foundations for platforms under ice-sheet-induced cyclic lateral loadings[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2007, 34(8/9): 1069-1079.

    [8]

    BAGHERI P, KIM J M. Evaluation of cyclic and monotonic loading behavior of bucket foundations used for offshore wind turbines[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 91(1): 101865.

    [9] 范庆来, 栾茂田. V-H-T荷载空间内海上风机桶形基础破坏包络面特性分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2010,43(4):113-118. (FAN Qinglai, LUAN Maotian. Failure envelopes of bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in V-H-T loading space[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(4): 113-118. (in Chinese)
    [10] 武科, 栾茂田, 范庆来, 等. 桶形基础承载性能弹塑性有限元数值分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报,2008,48(5):702-707. (WU Ke, LUAN Maotian, FAN Qinglai, et al. Numerical analysis of bearing capacity behavior of bucket foundation based on elasto-plastic FEM[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2008, 48(5): 702-707. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7511/dllgxb200805015
    [11] 刘润, 王磊, 丁红岩, 等. 复合加载模式下不排水饱和软黏土中宽浅式筒型基础地基承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(1):146-154. (LIU Run, WANG Lei, DING Hongyan, et al. Failure envelopes of large-diameter shallow buried bucket foundation in undrained saturated soft clay under combined loading conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(1): 146-154. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11779/CJGE201401014
    [12] 刘莹, 黄茂松, 李帅. 海上风电桩基础竖向承载力循环弱化简化分析[J]. 岩土力学,2013,34(9):2655-2660. (LIU Ying, HUANG Maosong, LI Shuai. Simplified analysis of cyclic degradation of axial bearing capacity for offshore wind turbine pile foundations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(9): 2655-2660. (in Chinese)
    [13] 刘锟, 赵春风, 王建华, 等. 软土地基桶形基础循环累积变形研究[J]. 岩土力学,2009,30(7):2037-2042. (LIU Kun, ZHAO Chunfeng, WANG Jianhua, et al. Cyclic accumulative deformation of bucket foundation on soft clay strata[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(7): 2037-2042. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2009.07.028
    [14] 焉振, 王元战. 考虑软基不排水强度循环弱化的格型钢板桩防波堤动力有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学,2017,38(5):1454-1462. (YAN Zhen, WANG Yuanzhan. Dynamic finite element analyses of steel-sheet-pile floodbank considering post-cyclic strength degradation of soft foundations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(5): 1454-1462. (in Chinese)
    [15] 戚蓝, 刘国威, 王海军. 近海风电筒型基础风机结构地震动力响应分析[J]. 水利水电技术,2012,43(7):116-118, 122. (QI Lan, LIU Guowei, WANG Haijun. Analysis on seismic dynamic response of structure for offshore wind turbine with bucket foundation[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2012, 43(7): 116-118, 122. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0860.2012.07.033
    [16] 于通顺, 王海军. 循环荷载下复合筒型基础地基孔隙水压力变化及液化分析[J]. 岩土力学,2014,35(3):820-826. (YU Tongshun, WANG Haijun. Pore water pressure fluctuation and liquefaction analysis of subgrade for composite bucket foundation under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(3): 820-826. (in Chinese)
    [17] 张小玲, 刘建秀, 杜修力, 等. 风浪流共同作用下海上风电基础与海床的动力响应分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2018,38(4):658-668. (ZHANG Xiaoling, LIU Jianxiu, DU Xiuli, et al. Dynamic response analysis of offshore wind power foundation and seabed under the combined wind, wave and current loadings[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2018, 38(4): 658-668. (in Chinese)
图(12)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量: 
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-05-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-03-26
  • 刊出日期:  2020-05-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回